Latest Survey on the Impact of the RRP Rule on Businesses
On February 1st, 2012, Professional Remodeler Magazine released some information they collected from a December 2011 survey they did asking remodelers about how the EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule (RRP) has impacted their businesses. No surprise, the survey indicated negative impact. 64 percent reported they had lost business as a result of the rule. What seems to consistently rise to the top is the impact of illegal competition from businesses that ignore the rule and its required work practices.
According to the survey summary posted by the magazine’s Editor in Chief, Jonathan Sweet, 46 % of respondents said less than 10 percent of remodelers in their local market are following the regulations and only 8 percent think more than half of their local competitors are in compliance.
The survey also asked about costs related to RRP. The EPA says additional costs are $35 to $376, depending on the size and the nature of the project. According to the survey results, 37 percent said the rule added more than $1000 to the cost of their average project and a full 81 percent said it adds more than $400. So much for the accuracy of EPA’s estimates.
Again, the survey proved what many have already determined in the past regarding consumer awareness about the rule: very few know anything about it. According to survey respondents,
65% of remodelers estimated that less than 10 percent of their potential clients are aware of the rule and only 5 percent think more than half of homeowners know about it. This is despite what EPA refers to as extensive consumer outreach.
One interesting observation I made about the survey results is that contractors in the northeast tend to be much more aware of the rule and much more in compliance with the rule than the rest of the country. For example, according to the survey results, 83 percent of remodelers in the Northeast were the most likely to be certified, compared to 75 percent in the West, 71 percent in the Midwest and 66 percent in the South. Also, 80 percent of remodelers in the Northeast described themselves as very familiar with the rule, compared to 70 percent in the Midwest and 61 percent in both the South and West.
In summary, the survey didn’t seem to provide any new information. It did however demonstrate that EPA has made very little progress getting the regulated community into compliance and with regards to educating consumers about the rule and the reasons for it. In my opinion, our government and our political leaders have created a false sense of security for our citizens by creating a rule they say will protect children from the dangers of lead poisoning.
It is sad to think that the “experts” appointed to protect our children designed and created this rule knowing that they could not afford to enforce it. The rule does however provide them with additional job security, something legitimate contractors can’t say it has done for them.
ShawnMcCadden.com
